Fifty points to the insomniac out there who recognizes and solves this equation:
It's an easy one ;)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There are stars and there are stars. I try to love them all. From Sirius and Betelgeuse to Nicole Kidman and Johnny Depp. There's a formula that implies that the closer one gets to stars on the ground (Hollywood), the fewer stars one can see in the sky (I counted two on my last trip). Well, I attempt to find a balance between the heavenly and the mundane! It's tough being an astronomer in Hollywood...
2 comments:
I'm not an insomniac and I have forgotten all the maths I ever knew but is the answer: 35438 ms-1 (to 5 s.f.)????
If not, let me say your blog is interesting. I like your mixed of careers, more people should do that rather than sticking with one thing.
Close! I think you just made an order of operations mistake:
First, the numerator:
2*(6.67x10^-11)*(5.97x10^24)=7.964x10^14
Then, divide by 6.37x10^6
=1.250x10^8
Then, take the square root:
=11200 m/s or 11.2km/sec (three sig figs- since you can't have more sig figs out than you put in)
That gives us (drum roll): The minimum speed an object without propulsion needs to have to move away indefinitely from the Earth (a.k.a. escape velocity).
I think you just saved the "inside" exponents for the end, which threw off the square root! ;)
BTW- The "brazilion" joke was my favorite of the week, too!
Thanks for responding!
Post a Comment